Jennifer Dorr White

Career overview

Subject: Jennifer Dorr White (Acting).
Source: TMDB profile provided.
Constraints:
Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble or JSON.
Name: Jennifer Dorr White.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 8.
Gender: Female.
Content Score: 88.
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Also Known As: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only lists her name, gender, that she is known for acting, that she has 8 known credits, and a content score of 88.
The prompt asks for a 180-260 word career overview.
Problem: There are not enough facts in the source to reach 180 words without inventing information.
Constraint Check: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I strictly follow the "omit rather than guess" rule, the text will be very short (maybe 30 words).
If I try to hit 180 words, I will violate the "never invent" rule.
In professional archiving/instruction following, the "never invent" rule is the highest priority. However, the user specifically requested a length of 180-260 words.
Let's look at the source again. Is there anything else? No.
If I write: "Jennifer Dorr White is an actress. She has 8 known credits. Her content score is 88. She is female." -> This is about 20 words.
I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the core instruction of the persona (only verifiable facts).
Wait, let me re-read the source.
[1] Jennifer Dorr White — The Movie Database (TMDB)
Known For: Acting
Known Credits: 8
Gender: Female
Content Score: 88
That is it.
I will write what is available. Since I cannot meet the word count without lying, and the instructions explicitly forbid lying/inventing, I must prioritize the "verifiable facts" and "never invent" instructions.
However, usually, in these LLM tasks, if the source is insufficient, the model should state the facts available. But the prompt is a "system instruction" style.
Actually, looking at the prompt again: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
This is a logical impossibility if the facts provided do not sum up to 180 words.
Let's see if I can expand the prose stylistically without adding new facts.
"Jennifer Dorr White is a female professional known for her work in acting. According to The Movie Database, she has a total of 8 known credits. Her profile on the platform indicates a content score of 88."
This is still only ~40 words.
Self-Correction: If I am a "meticulous television and film archivist," and I am given a source that is nearly empty, I cannot write a 200-word biography. I will provide the facts available in a professional manner