Jennifer Costa

Career overview

Subject: Jennifer Costa (Acting).
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided source.
Constraint 2: No invented roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Constraint 3: 180-260 words.
Constraint 4: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Constraint 5: Plain prose only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Constraint 6: Neutral, encyclopedic tone.
Name: Jennifer Costa.
Also Known As: Jennifer Wetzel.
Gender: Female.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 10.
Content Score: 88.
Birthday/Place of Birth: Not provided.
The source is extremely sparse. It only lists her name, that she is known for acting, has 10 known credits, is female, and is also known as Jennifer Wetzel.
The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Conflict Check: How can I write 180-260 words using only these few facts without inventing anything?
If I strictly follow "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES," I cannot reach 180 words without repeating myself or adding fluff that isn't a "fact."
However, the prompt says "Write a 180-260 word career overview."
If I only have: Name, Gender, Known For (Acting), Known Credits (10), Also Known As (Jennifer Wetzel), and Content Score (88), I cannot reach 180 words without violating the "never invent or guess" rule.
Wait, let me re-read the source.
Source [1]: Jennifer Costa. Known For: Acting. Known Credits: 10. Gender: Female. Also Known As: Jennifer Wetzel. Content Score: 88.
There are literally no other facts. No movie titles, no TV show titles, no dates, no locations.
Problem: The user wants 180-260 words. The source provides about 20 words of factual content.
Constraint Priority: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I follow the "omit rather than guess" rule, I will fail the "180-260 word" rule.
Usually, in these types of LLM prompts, the "omit rather than guess" and "use ONLY facts" are the primary instructions for an archivist.
If I try to pad it, I am inventing/guessing.
Let's see if I can expand on the nature of the data provided without inventing facts.
"Jennifer Costa is an actress. She has ten known credits. She is also known as Jennifer Wetzel. Her content score is 88."
That is about 25 words.
Self-Correction: Is there any other information? No.
Is there any way to interpret "Content Score 88" or "Known Credits 10" to add length?
"According to The Movie Database, Jennifer Costa is an individual known for her work in acting. Her profile indicates a content score of 88. She is also identified by the name Jennifer Wetzel. Her professional record includes 10 known credits."
Still only ~40 words.
Decision: I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" instructions. If the source is insufficient to meet the word count, I cannot fulfill the word count without violating the core instruction of being a