Jason Hurt

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a career overview of Jason Hurt (Acting).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
No inventing titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
If a detail is not in the material, omit it.
Style: Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose, plain text.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble, no JSON.
Source [1]: Jason Hurt — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1006767) Jason Hurt actor biography.
Wait, the provided source text is just a link/title: "Jason Hurt — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1006767) Jason Hurt actor biography".
There is no actual biographical text or synopsis provided in the prompt.
The prompt says: "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" content is: "[1] Jason Hurt — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1006767) Jason Hurt actor biography".
There are no facts about his career, roles, movies, or dates in the provided text.
If I write a biography based on general knowledge, I violate the instruction: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
If I write nothing, I fail the length requirement (180-260 words).
However, the instruction "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess" is paramount.
Since the provided source contains zero biographical facts (only a name and a link), I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the core constraint of only using provided facts.
The user provided a source link but no content.
As an archivist following strict instructions, I cannot invent information.
If I follow the instruction "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess," and there are no details, the output would be empty.
However, usually, in these LLM prompts, there's a mistake where the user forgot to paste the text. But I must act as the persona.
Let's look closer at the source: "[1] Jason Hurt — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1006767) Jason Hurt actor biography".
There is literally no data.
Self-Correction: If I am a "meticulous television and film archivist" and the source provided is empty of facts, I cannot write a 180-260 word overview.
Wait, is there any hidden text? No.
Is there a way to interpret the source? The source identifies Jason Hurt as an actor.
I will state that the provided documentation does not contain biographical details or career information for Jason Hurt.
Wait, looking at the prompt again. Is it possible the user expects me to know who Jason Hurt is? No, the prompt explicitly says: "Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details."
Since I cannot fulfill the word count without violating the "ONLY facts present above" rule, I must conclude that the provided source is insufficient to generate the requested overview.
However, if I am being tested on my ability to follow instructions, and the instruction is "Write a 180-260 word career