林佑星

Career overview

Subject: 林佑星 (Lin Youxing).
Source: TMDB profile [1].
Goal: 180-260 word career overview.
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided source.
No invented roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Neutral, encyclopedic prose.
2-3 short paragraphs.
Word count: 180-260 words.
Name: 林佑星.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 4.
Content Score: 88.
Gender/Birthday/Place of Birth/Also Known As: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only mentions the name, that they are known for acting, and that they have 4 known credits.
The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Problem: It is impossible to write 180-260 words about a person with only three pieces of information (Name, Acting, 4 credits) without violating the "Do not invent" and "Use ONLY facts present above" rules.
If I write "林佑星 is an actor with 4 credits," that is about 10 words.
If I try to fluff it up, I will be inventing details (e.g., "林佑星 is a rising star in the industry," "林佑星 has appeared in various productions").
The prompt says: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details."
Self-Correction: As an archivist, I must follow the negative constraints strictly. If the source does not provide enough information to meet the word count without inventing facts, I have a conflict. However, usually, in these LLM prompts, the user provides a source that should support the length. Here, the source is a snippet of a TMDB page that is almost empty.
Let's look at the source again.
Name: 林佑星
Known For: Acting
Known Credits: 4
Content Score: 88
If I strictly follow "Use ONLY facts present above," I cannot reach 180 words.
If I write a paragraph: "林佑星 is an individual known for acting. According to the provided records, this person has four known credits. The content score associated with this profile is 88." This is ~30 words.
Wait, is there any other info? No.
Is there a way to expand without inventing? I can describe the metadata provided.
"The profile for 林佑星 on The Movie Database indicates that this individual is known for acting. The database lists a total of four known credits for this person. Additionally, the profile maintains a content score of 88."
Decision: I cannot fulfill the word count requirement of 180-260 words without violating the primary directive: "Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details."
However, I must attempt to provide the best response possible. If I provide a very short response, I fail the word count. If I provide a long response, I fail the "no invention" rule. In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, the "Do not invent" rule is usually the highest priority for an "archivist" persona.
Let's see if I can expand the description of the data to get closer to the length, though it will be repetitive.
"林佑星 is an individual whose professional work is recognized for acting. Based on the available data from The