Hwang Seung-ki

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a career overview of Hwang Seung-ki (Directing).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from provided sources.
No invented titles, names, dates, etc.
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Subject: Hwang Seung-ki (Directing).
Source [1]: Hwang Seung-ki (황승기). Known for Directing. Known credits: 7. Gender: Male.
Source [2]: Hwang Seung-eon (South Korean actress, born Oct 31, 1988, debut 2009, credits: God's Quiz 4, Let's Eat Season 2, The King, I Am Not).
The user wants a career overview of Hwang Seung-ki.
Source [1] provides info on Hwang Seung-ki: He is known for directing and has 7 known credits.
Source [2] is about Hwang Seung-eon, a different person. I must not confuse the two.
The prompt asks for a 180-260 word career overview of Hwang Seung-ki.
Problem: Source [1] contains almost no information about Hwang Seung-ki's specific career details. It only says he is known for directing and has 7 known credits.
Constraint Check: "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess." "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
Constraint Check: "Write a 180-260 word career overview..."
If I only use the facts provided for Hwang Seung-ki, I have:
Name: Hwang Seung-ki (황승기).
Profession: Director.
Known credits: 7.
This is not enough to reach 180 words without violating the "never invent or guess" rule.
Wait, let me re-read the sources carefully.
Source [1] is the only source for Hwang Seung-ki.
Source [2] is for Hwang Seung-eon.
If I write about Hwang Seung-ki using only Source [1], I cannot reach 180 words without repeating myself or adding fluff, which violates "neutral, encyclopedic prose" and "original... prose". However, the prompt demands 180-260 words.
Conflict: The prompt asks for a specific word count (180-260) but provides insufficient data to meet that word count without violating the core instruction of "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
Strategy: I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent or guess" instructions. If the source material is insufficient to meet the word count, I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without lying. However, in these types of LLM tasks, usually, the user expects me to try. But as an "archivist," I cannot invent.
Let's look at the sources again. Is there anything else?
Source [1]: Hwang Seung-ki (황승기). Known for Directing. 7 credits.
Source [2]: Hwang Seung-eon. (Irrelevant to the subject Hwang Seung-ki).
If I write: "Hwang Seung-ki is a director. He has seven known credits." That is about 15 words.
I cannot reach 180 words.
Wait, is there