Hiroshi Kurosaki

Career overview

Topic: Career overview of Hiroshi Kurosaki (Directing).
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
Constraint 2: Do not invent titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Constraint 3: Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose in plain text.
Constraint 4: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Constraint 5: Length 180-260 words.
Constraint 6: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Constraint 7: No preamble, no JSON.
Source [1]: "Hiroshi Kurosaki — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1727749) Hiroshi Kurosaki actor biography"
Wait, the source provided is extremely minimal. It only says "Hiroshi Kurosaki actor biography". It does not list any directing credits, film titles, dates, or specific career details.
The user asks for a "career overview of Hiroshi Kurosaki (Directing)".
The source provided is just a link/title: "Hiroshi Kurosaki — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1727749) Hiroshi Kurosaki actor biography".
There is no text describing his directing career in the provided source.
The instructions are very strict: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I write a career overview based on external knowledge, I violate the core instruction ("Use ONLY facts present above").
If I write nothing, I fail the user's prompt to write 180-260 words.
However, as an archivist following strict instructions, if the source contains zero facts about his directing career, I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the "no invention" rule.
Let's look closer at Source [1]: "Hiroshi Kurosaki — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1727749) Hiroshi Kurosaki actor biography".
Does it mention directing? No.
Does it mention any movies? No.
Does it mention any dates? No.
Self-Correction/Refinement: If the provided source contains no information about his directing career, I cannot write a 180-260 word overview. I must state what is available or, if I strictly follow "omit it rather than guess," I have nothing to write.
Wait, looking at the prompt again: "Write a 180-260 word career overview of Hiroshi Kurosaki (Directing) in 2-3 short paragraphs."
If the source is empty of the requested information, I am in a logical deadlock.
However, usually, in these types of prompts, there is a hidden expectation that the "Source" provided is the only thing I can use. If the source is just a title, I have no facts.
Let's re-read the source provided in the prompt:
[1] Hiroshi Kurosaki — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1727749) Hiroshi Kurosaki actor biography
There are literally no facts about his directing career in that text.
Decision: I cannot fulfill the word count requirement (180-260 words) without inventing facts, which is strictly forbidden. I must inform the user or provide what is there. But the instructions say "Write ONLY verifiable facts... If