Grzegorz Ciągardlak

Career overview

Subject: Grzegorz Ciągardlak (Acting).
Source: Provided TMDB snippet.
Constraints:
Only verifiable facts from the source.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble, no JSON.
Name: Grzegorz Ciągardlak.
Profession: Acting (Known For: Acting).
Known Credits: 19.
Birthday: August 20, 1977.
Age: 49 years old.
Place of Birth: Warszawa, Polska.
Content Score: 88.
Paragraph 1: Personal Background.
Grzegorz Ciągardlak is an actor born in Warszawa, Polska. He was born on August 20, 1977, making him 49 years old.
Paragraph 2: Career Overview.
In his professional career, Ciągardlak is recognized for his work in acting. He has a total of 19 known credits to his name. His profile on The Movie Database indicates a content score of 88.
Current Word Count Check:
"Grzegorz Ciągardlak is an actor born in Warszawa, Polska. He was born on August 20, 1977, making him 49 years old. In his professional career, Ciągardlak is recognized for his work in acting. He has a total of 19 known credits to his name. His profile on The Movie Database indicates a content score of 88."
Total words: ~55 words.
Problem: The prompt requires 180-260 words. The source material is extremely sparse.
Constraint Conflict: I must write 180-260 words using only the provided facts. If I only have ~50 words of facts, I cannot reach 180 words without inventing information, which is strictly forbidden by the instructions ("You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess").
Re-evaluating the Source:
Name: Grzegorz Ciągardlak
Known For: Acting
Known Credits: 19
Birthday: August 20, 1977
Age: 49
Birthplace: Warszawa, Polska
Content Score: 88
Strategy: I will expand the prose using formal, encyclopedic language to describe the available facts, but I cannot add new facts. However, if the facts are insufficient to reach the word count, I am in a "catch-22".
Instruction Priority: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Instruction Priority 2: "Write a 180-260 word career overview..."

If I follow the "No invention" rule, I cannot meet the word count. If I follow the word count rule, I must invent. In professional prompt engineering/instruction following, the "No invention/Only verifiable facts" rule is usually the primary constraint for an archivist persona. However, I will try to be as descriptive as possible with the existing facts to see if I can get closer, though 180 words is a lot for one sentence of data.

Drafting attempt 2 (trying to be wordy with the facts):
Grzegorz Ciągardlak is an individual known for his work in the