Gary Green

Career overview

Subject: Gary Green (Acting).
Source: TMDB profile provided.
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only.
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Name: Gary Green.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 15.
Gender: Male.
Content Score: 88.
Other info: Birthday (not provided), Place of Birth (not provided), Also Known As (not provided).
The source is extremely sparse. It only says he is an actor with 15 known credits and a content score of 88.
I need to reach 180-260 words using only these facts.
Problem: If I only use the facts provided, I cannot reach 180 words without being incredibly repetitive or "fluffy," but the instructions say "Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose" and "Do not invent...".
Wait, if I only have "Gary Green is a male actor with 15 known credits and a content score of 88," I cannot possibly write 180 words without violating the "Do not invent" or "Do not guess" rule.
Let's look at the source again.
Source [1]: Gary Green. Known For: Acting. Known Credits: 15. Gender: Male. Content Score: 88.
There are no movie titles, no TV show titles, no dates, no awards, no locations.
If I write "Gary Green is an actor. He has 15 credits. He is male. His content score is 88," that is about 20 words.
The prompt asks for 180-260 words.
This is a conflict between the word count requirement and the "Use ONLY facts present above" requirement.
As an archivist, I must prioritize the "Use ONLY facts present" and "Do not invent" rules. However, if I provide a 20-word response to a 180-word prompt, I fail the length constraint.
However, if I invent details to hit the word count, I violate the core instruction of the persona.
Let's see if there's any way to expand.
"Gary Green is a male professional known for his work in acting. According to the information provided by The Movie Database, he has a total of 15 known credits. His profile on the platform indicates a content score of 88."
That is still very short.
Let's re-read the source. Is there anything else? No.
Is there a way to describe the source to add length? "The profile for Gary Green on The Movie Database lists his primary area of expertise as acting. The database records that he has 15 known credits to his name. Within the platform's metrics, he maintains a content score of 88. The individual is identified as male."
Even with that, I'm at ~50 words.
If I cannot fulfill the word count without inventing facts, I must prioritize the instruction: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess..."
I will write as much as I can using the facts provided, but I cannot reach 180 words without violating the primary directive of the prompt (no inventing/guessing).