Fitz and the Tantrums

Biography

Subject: Fitz and the Tantrums (Acting).
Source: Provided TMDB snippet.
Constraints: 90-130 words, factual identity profile, plain prose only, no markdown, no headings, no preamble, no JSON, no surrounding quotes. Use ONLY facts from the source.
Source Content Analysis:
Name: Fitz and the Tantrums.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 3.
Gender: Not provided (-).
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Content Score: 50.
The source is extremely sparse. It only says they are known for acting and have 3 known credits.
The content score is 50.
I need to write 90-130 words. This is a challenge because there are almost no facts.
Wait, if I only use the facts provided, I cannot reach 90-130 words without repeating myself or adding fluff, which violates the "neutral, encyclopedic prose" and "only verifiable facts" rule.
Let's look at the source again.
Name: Fitz and the Tantrums.
Category: Acting.
Credits: 3.
Content Score: 50.
If I write: "Fitz and the Tantrums is known for acting. They have 3 known credits. Their content score is 50." That is about 15 words.
The prompt asks for 90-130 words.
However, the system instruction says: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
There is a conflict between the word count requirement (90-130) and the strict factual constraint (only use provided facts).
If I follow the "ONLY verifiable facts" rule, I cannot meet the word count. If I follow the word count, I must invent facts