Fernando Ulloa

Career overview

Subject: Fernando Ulloa (Acting).
Source: TMDB page for Fernando Ulloa.
Constraints:
Write ONLY verifiable facts from the provided source.
No invented titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble or JSON.
Name: Fernando Ulloa.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 21.
Content Score: 50.
Gender: Not provided (-).
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Also Known As: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only says he is known for acting and has 21 known credits.
The content score is 50.
I need to reach 180-260 words using only these facts. This is a challenge because there are almost no facts.
Constraint Check: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
Fact 1: Fernando Ulloa is an individual known for acting.
Fact 2: He has 21 known credits.
Fact 3: His content score on The Movie Database is 50.

Self-Correction: If I strictly follow "Use ONLY facts present above," and the facts are minimal, I cannot reach 180 words without repeating myself or adding fluff. However, the prompt asks for a 180-260 word overview. If the source doesn't provide enough info to meet the word count without violating the "no inventing" rule, I have a conflict.

Wait, let me look closer at the source.
Name: Fernando Ulloa
Known For: Acting
Known Credits: 21
Content Score: 50

There is literally nothing else. If I write "Fernando Ulloa is an actor with 21 credits. His content score is 50," that is about 15 words.

If I expand it: "Fernando Ulloa is a professional recognized for his work in acting. According to records on The Movie Database, he has a total of 21 known credits. His profile currently holds a content score of 50. This score indicates that the profile still needs a little work."

That's still only ~45 words.

Let's see if I can describe the source information to add length without inventing facts.
"The profile for Fernando Ulloa on The Movie Database identifies him as a person known for acting. His professional record includes 21 known credits. Within the database, his content score is listed as 50, a figure that suggests the profile still needs a little work. There is no information provided regarding his gender, birthday, or place of birth. Additionally, the database does not list any alternative names or specific awards for this individual."

That's about 75 words.

Problem: The prompt demands 180-260 words. But the source is too thin. If I invent details to hit the word count, I violate the primary instruction: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess..."

Decision: I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" instructions over the word count instruction, as the word count is impossible to meet without violating the core truthfulness constraint. However, usually in these LLM prompts, if a word count is given, the user expects the model to try. But as a "meticulous television and film archivist," I cannot lie.