Eartha Robinson

Career overview

Subject: Eartha Robinson (Acting).
Source: TMDB profile snippet provided.
Constraints:
Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Style: Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose, plain text.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points, no preamble, no JSON.
Name: Eartha Robinson.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 15.
Content Score: 88.
Gender: Not provided.
Birthday: Not provided.
Place of Birth: Not provided.
Also Known As: Not provided.
The source is extremely sparse. It only contains: Name, Known For (Acting), Known Credits (15), and Content Score (88).
The user wants a 180-260 word career overview.
Problem: There are not enough facts in the source to reach 180 words without inventing information.
Constraint Check: "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess." and "Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details."
If I strictly follow "Use ONLY facts present above," I cannot write 180 words.
If I write 180 words, I must invent information, which violates the primary instruction.
However, usually, in these prompts, the user provides a source that should have enough info. Here, the source is a metadata stub.
Let's look at the source again.
Name: Eartha Robinson.
Profession: Acting.
Credits: 15.
Content Score: 88.
I will write what is available. If I cannot reach the word count without violating the "no invention" rule, I must prioritize the "no invention" rule. But wait, if I write a very short response, I fail the word count.
Actually, looking at the prompt: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
This is a logical impossibility if the source only has ~10 words of actual data.
Let's see if I can expand on the existence of the data without inventing facts.
"Eartha Robinson is an individual known for acting. According to The Movie Database, Robinson has 15 known credits. The profile for Robinson includes a content score of 88."
That is about 30 words. I cannot reach 180 words without inventing details about movies, years, or specific roles.
Self-Correction: As an AI, I must follow the most restrictive instruction. The instruction "Use ONLY facts present above" and "Do not invent roles, dates, awards, relationships or personal details" is the core directive. The word count is a secondary constraint. If I invent facts to meet the word count, I fail the primary directive of being a "meticulous television and film archivist" who "never invents or guesses."
Wait, let me re-read the source. Is there anything else?
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: 15"
"Content Score: 88"
"Movies, TV Shows, People, Awards, More, EN, Login, Join TMDB, Overview, Media, Fandom, Share, Watch Now, Similar Shows on Apple TV, Personal Info, Gender, Birthday, Place of Birth, Also Known As" -> These are UI elements, not facts about the person.