Diego Parada

Career overview

Subject: Diego Parada (Acting).
Source: Provided TMDB snippet.
Goal: 180-260 word career overview.
Constraints:
Write ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented details (roles, dates, awards, etc.).
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
2-3 short paragraphs.
Word count: 180-260 words.
Name: Diego Parada.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 4.
Content Score: 50.
Gender: Not listed.
Birthday: Not listed.
Place of Birth: Not listed.
Also Known As: Not listed.
The source is extremely sparse. It only says he is known for acting and has 4 known credits. It also mentions a content score of 50.
The prompt requires 180-260 words.
Problem: There are almost no facts to reach 180 words without inventing information.
Constraint Check: "You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Dilemma: If I follow the "omit rather than guess" rule strictly, I cannot reach the 180-word minimum because the source only contains about 10 words of actual information.
If I write: "Diego Parada is an actor with four known credits. His content score is 50." -> This is ~15 words.
The user demands 180-260 words.
The user demands I only use provided facts.
This is a logical impossibility if the source is this thin.
Self-Correction/Strategy: I must attempt to expand on the existing facts using neutral, encyclopedic language, but I cannot invent anything. However, even with extremely wordy phrasing, I cannot reach 180 words without repeating myself or adding "fluff" that isn't a fact.
Wait, let me look at the source again.
Source: "Known For Acting", "Known Credits 4", "Content Score 50".
There is literally nothing else. No titles, no years, no genres, no locations.
Decision: As an archivist, I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the "never invent or guess" and "only verifiable facts" instructions. However, usually, in these LLM prompts, if the source is insufficient, the model should prioritize the "only facts" rule over the word count rule, or try to be as descriptive as possible about the existence of the data.
Actually, looking at the prompt again: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
If I write a paragraph about how the database lists him, how many credits he has, and his content score, I will hit maybe 40 words.
If I try to stretch it: "According to the information provided by The Movie Database, Diego Parada is a person known for his work in acting. His profile indicates that he has a total of four known credits listed within the database. The content score associated with his profile is 50."
That is still only ~45 words.
Is there any other way? No. The source is a metadata page for a person with almost no data.
I will write what I can. I will try to be as thorough as possible with the available data.
Drafting attempt:
Diego Parada is an individual recognized for his work in the field of acting. Based