Derya Şensoy

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview of Derya Şensoy (Acting).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
No inventing titles, names, dates, awards, etc.
If a detail is not in the material, omit it.
Style: Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose, plain text.
Formatting: No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Source provided: [1] Derya Şensoy — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1666684) Derya Şensoy actor biography.
Source [1]: "Derya Şensoy — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1666684) Derya Şensoy actor biography"
Wait, the source provided is just a link/title. There is no actual text describing her career in the prompt. The prompt says "Use ONLY facts present above."
Looking at the "SOURCES" section: It only contains the name and the link. It does not contain a biography or a list of credits.
Since the provided source contains zero biographical information or filmography details (it's just a reference to a page), I cannot write a 180-260 word career overview without violating the core instruction: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I use my internal knowledge to write about Derya Şensoy, I am violating the instruction to use only the provided material.
If I write nothing, I am not fulfilling the word count requirement.
However, the instruction "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess" is the primary directive for an archivist.
The user provided a source that is a link/title but no content.
I cannot fulfill the word count (180-260 words) because there is no information to write about.
I must inform the user or attempt to write based only on what is there.
What is there? "Derya Şensoy — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1666684) Derya Şensoy actor biography".
I can state that Derya Şensoy is an actor with a biography listed on The Movie Database (TMDB). But that is not a "career overview" and won't reach 180 words.

Self-Correction: In these types of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) tasks, if the source is empty or insufficient, the model should not hallucinate. If I cannot meet the word count because the source is empty, I cannot fulfill the prompt's length requirement without violating the "no inventing" rule.

Wait, let me look closer at the prompt.
"SOURCES: [1] Derya Şensoy — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1666684) Derya Şensoy actor biography"
There is literally no text.

Is there a possibility the user expects me to know her career?
The instructions say: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
This is a hard constraint.

*What if I write a response stating