David Michael Reardon

Career overview

Subject: David Michael Reardon (Acting).
Source: TMDB profile provided.
Goal: 180-260 word career overview.
Constraints:
ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented details (roles, dates, awards, etc.).
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble or JSON.
Name: David Michael Reardon.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 11.
Content Score: 88.
Gender: Not provided.
Birthday: Not provided.
Place of Birth: Not provided.
Also Known As: Not provided.
The source is extremely sparse. It only lists his name, that he is known for acting, that he has 11 known credits, and a content score of 88.
The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Problem: There is almost no information to reach 180 words without inventing details.
Constraint Check: "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess." "You never invent or guess titles, character names, actor names, dates, awards, ratings, box-office or viewership numbers, or plot points."
If I strictly follow the "only verifiable facts" rule, I cannot reach 180 words.
The source says:
Name: David Michael Reardon.
Profession: Acting.
Total known credits: 11.
Content score: 88.
Let's try to expand the existing facts into neutral prose.
"David Michael Reardon is an individual recognized for his work in acting. According to records on The Movie Database, he has a total of 11 known credits within the industry. His profile on the platform maintains a content score of 88."
This is only about 40 words. I cannot reach 180 words without violating the primary instruction: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
Wait, the prompt says: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
This is a logical contradiction if the source doesn't contain enough information.
However, as an AI, I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" instructions over the word count if the word count forces invention. But usually, in these types of prompts, if I can't meet the word count, I should try to be as descriptive as possible with the available facts.
Let's look at the source again.
Name: David Michael Reardon.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 11.
Content Score: 88.
There is literally nothing else. No movies, no shows, no dates, no locations.
If I write 180 words, I will be hallucinating.
If I write the truth, I will be under the word count.
The instruction "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess" is the most critical instruction for a "meticulous television and film archivist."
Let's try to see if I can stretch the metadata.
"David Michael Reardon is a professional known for his work in acting. As documented on The Movie Database, his career includes 11 known credits. His profile on the site features a content score of 88."
This is still very short. I will provide