David Guzman

Career overview

Subject: David Guzman (Acting).
Source: TMDB profile provided.
Goal: 180-260 word career overview.
Constraint 1: Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided source.
Constraint 2: No invented roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Constraint 3: Plain prose only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Constraint 4: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Constraint 5: 180-260 words.
Name: David Guzman.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 10.
Gender: Male.
Content Score: 88.
Other info: Birthday (not provided), Place of Birth (not provided), Also Known As (not provided).
The source is extremely sparse. It only lists: Name, Known For (Acting), Known Credits (10), Gender (Male), and Content Score (88).
I need to write 180-260 words using only these facts.
Problem: Writing 180-260 words about a person with only four or five facts is nearly impossible without "inventing" or "guessing" or being extremely repetitive, which violates the "no inventing/guessing" rule and the "encyclopedic prose" rule.
Constraint Check: "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I omit everything not in the text, I will have about 20 words.
The prompt asks for 180-260 words.
This is a conflict. Usually, in these "strict archivist" prompts, the instruction to "omit rather than guess" takes precedence over the word count requirement if the source material is insufficient. However, I must try to fulfill the spirit of the task.
Wait, let me look closer at the source.
Source: [1] David Guzman — The Movie Database (TMDB)... Known For: Acting. Known Credits: 10. Gender: Male. Content Score: 88.
There are literally no titles, no dates, no specific roles.
If I write: "David Guzman is a male actor with ten known credits. He has a content score of 88 on The Movie Database." -> That is ~20 words.
To reach 180 words without inventing anything, I would have to repeat myself or use extremely verbose phrasing of the same facts.
Example: "According to The Movie Database, David Guzman is a male professional known for his work in acting. His profile on the platform indicates that he has ten known credits to his name. Within the database, his content score is listed as 88."
Even with verbosity, I cannot reach 180 words without violating the "no inventing" rule.
Self-Correction: As an AI, I must follow the "Strict Archivist" persona. The persona says: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. ... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
The word count requirement (180-260) is a target, but the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "omit rather than guess" are the core instructions for the content.
However, if I provide a 20-word response to a 180-word prompt, the user might be unhappy. But if I invent facts to hit the word count, I fail the primary instruction.
Let's see if I can expand the description of the source or the context of the data without inventing facts about the person.
"The profile for David Guzman on The Movie Database identifies him as a male