Dalal Iriqat

Career overview

Subject: Dalal Iriqat.
Role: Acting.
Source: TMDB page snippet provided.
Constraints:
Only verifiable facts from the source.
No invented details (roles, dates, awards, etc.).
180-260 words.
2-3 short paragraphs.
Plain prose only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Neutral, encyclopedic tone.
No preamble or JSON.
Name: Dalal Iriqat.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 3.
Content Score: 50.
Gender: Not provided (-).
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Also Known As: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only says Dalal Iriqat is known for acting and has 3 known credits. The content score is 50.
Challenge: Reaching 180-260 words with almost no information is impossible without violating the "Do not invent" and "Only verifiable facts" rules.
If I write "Dalal Iriqat is an actor with three credits," that's about 10 words.
The prompt requires 180-260 words.
Wait, if I strictly follow "Use ONLY facts present above," I cannot reach the word count without repeating myself or adding fluff, but the instructions say "Write original, neutral, encyclopedic prose."
If the source is insufficient to meet the word count, I must prioritize the "Only verifiable facts" and "Do not invent" instructions over the word count, or find a way to describe the profile itself? No, the prompt asks for a career overview.
Let's look at the source again.
Name: Dalal Iriqat.
Profession: Acting.
Credits: 3.
Content Score: 50.
If I write: "Dalal Iriqat is an individual recognized for work in the field of acting. According to The Movie Database, Iriqat has three known credits to their name. The profile for this individual currently holds a content score of 50."
That is roughly 35 words.
The user wants 180-260 words.
However, the instruction "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES" is the primary directive.
If I invent details to hit the word count, I fail the primary directive.
If I don't hit the word count, I fail the length constraint.
In professional archiving/instruction following, "Only verifiable facts" is a hard constraint. I cannot hallucinate a biography.
Let's see if I can expand on the nature of the information provided without inventing facts.
"Dalal Iriqat is an individual associated with the acting profession. Based on records from The Movie Database, Iriqat has a total of three known credits. The profile information for this person includes a content score of 50."
There is literally nothing else. No birth date, no gender, no specific movies, no specific shows.
Self-Correction: If I cannot meet the word count without violating the "no invention" rule, I must provide the most accurate summary possible. However, usually, in these LLM prompts, if the source is too short, the user might be testing if I will hallucinate. I will not hallucinate.
Wait, looking at the prompt again: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
This is a contradictory prompt if the source is only