Connie Chan Si-Wing

Career overview

Subject: Connie Chan Si-Wing (Acting).
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Constraints: Use only verifiable facts from provided sources. No invention. No markdown. No headings. No bullet points. Plain text. Neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Sources:
[1] TMDB profile for Connie Chan Si-Wing. Stage name: 陳思穎. Known for: Acting. Known credits: 8. Also known as: 陈思颖, Sze Wing Chan, Chan Sze-Wing.
[2] A text file containing random words/fragments. (Likely irrelevant/noise, but I must check for names or facts).
Name: Connie Chan Si-Wing.
Stage Name: 陳思穎.
Also Known As: 陈思颖, Sze Wing Chan, Chan Sze-Wing.
Profession: Acting.
Known Credits: 8.
Gender: Female.
Source [2] is a list of disconnected words ("lin chan too iting dent ghts ty spo..."). It does not contain biographical information or career details about Connie Chan Si-Wing.
The sources are extremely sparse. I have a name, a stage name, three aliases, a gender, and a credit count.
The user wants a 180-260 word career overview.
Problem: I cannot reach 180 words without inventing information, which is strictly forbidden by the prompt ("You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess.").
If I write only what is there: "Connie Chan Si-Wing is an actress. Her stage name is 陳思穎. She is also known as 陈思颖, Sze Wing Chan, and Chan Sze-Wing. She has 8 known credits." This is about 30 words.
The prompt requires 180-260 words.
However, the instruction "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES" is the primary directive.
In professional archiving/instruction following, if the source material is insufficient to meet a length constraint without violating the "no invention" rule, the "no invention" rule takes precedence. I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the core constraint of the persona.
Self-Correction/Refinement: I will write everything available in a formal, encyclopedic manner. I will try to expand the phrasing to be as professional as possible, but I cannot add facts.
Drafting:
Connie Chan Si-Wing is a female actor. She is recognized for her work in acting and has eight known credits. Her stage name is 陳思穎. In addition to her primary name, she is also known by the names 陈思颖, Sze Wing Chan, and Chan Sze-Wing.
Wait, I need to check if I can expand the prose to get closer to the word count without adding facts.
"Connie Chan Si-Wing is an individual known for her work in the field of acting. According to her professional profile, she has a total of eight known credits. She is identified by the stage name 陳思穎. Her professional identity is also associated with several other names, including 陈思颖, Sze Wing Chan, and Chan Sze-Wing. She is female."
This is still only ~60 words. The prompt asks for 180-260 words.
If I cannot meet the word count without lying, I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" instructions.
Let's look at Source [2] again. Is there anything there? "lin chan too iting dent ghts ty spo need blu inst being âĿ¤ wel ls him may sting na ely little ga nat... ends wing pas 'll vol sa gs many jec before graph ny