Clara Porák

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a career overview of Clara Porák (Acting).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided sources.
No invented titles, names, dates, etc.
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Topic: Clara Porák (Acting).
Source [1]: Clara Porák is known for acting. Content score 50.
Source [2]: Clara Porák is an actor. Worked on productions such as Rette sich, wer kann.
Source [3]: X profile (no posts).
Source [4]: Clara Porák, born 1997, is a freelance journalist and managing director of an inclusive digital medium in Vienna. Co-founder of Netzwerk Klimajournalismus Österreich. Researches education, environment, and social justice.
Self-Correction/Conflict Check: Source [4] describes a Clara Porák who is a journalist born in 1997. Source [1] and [2] describe a Clara Porák who is an actor. The prompt specifically asks for a career overview of "Clara Porák (Acting)". I must focus on the acting credits provided.
Facts for Acting:
Name: Clara Porák.
Profession: Actor.
Known credits: Rette sich, wer kann.
Wait, the word count requirement is 180-260 words.
The provided information for the "Acting" Clara Porák is extremely sparse: "Known for acting" and "worked in productions like Rette sich, wer kann".
If I only use the acting facts, I cannot reach 180 words without inventing details, which is strictly forbidden.
Let's look at Source [4] again. It provides a lot of detail about a Clara Porák (journalist). Is this the same person? The prompt asks for "Clara Porák (Acting)". If I include the journalist info, I might be conflating two different people or attributing journalist details to the actor. However, in archival work, if the name is identical and no distinction is made in the sources, I must be careful.
Actually, Source [4] is a different person/profile (Journalist/Managing Director). Source [1] and [2] are about the Actor.
If I strictly follow "Write a 180-260 word career overview of Clara Porák (Acting)", and the only facts about her acting are "Actor" and "Rette sich, wer kann", I cannot fulfill the word count without violating the "never invent or guess" rule.
Re-evaluating the sources:
Source [1] (TMDB): Clara Porák, Known For: Acting.
Source [2] (Palomitacas): Clara Porák is an Actor. Worked on Rette sich, wer kann.
Source [4] (Hamburg Media School): Clara Porák, born 1997, freelance journalist, managing director in Vienna, co-founder of Netzwerk Klimajournalismus Österreich.
Problem: The prompt asks for an overview of the Acting career. The acting information is insufficient for 180 words.
Strategy: I will include the information available about Clara Porák as an actor. If the sources imply the journalist is the same person (though they seem distinct in profession), I can mention the biographical details from Source [4] if they are presented as facts about "Clara Porák". However, Source [4] is a separate entity.
Wait: If I write only about the actor, I will have about 20 words.
*Let'