Charlie Rubin

Career overview

Role: Meticulous television and film archivist.
Task: Write a career overview of Charlie Rubin (Writing).
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES.
No inventing/guessing (titles, names, dates, etc.).
Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Plain text only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble or JSON.
Source [1]: Charlie Rubin — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1223824) Charlie Rubin actor biography.
Wait, the user provided a link/reference to a TMDB page but did not provide the actual text content of the biography in the prompt.
Looking closer at the prompt: "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" content is: "[1] Charlie Rubin — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1223824) Charlie Rubin actor biography".
There is no synopsis or text content provided.
The prompt says "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" section contains no biographical details, no filmography, no dates, no credits. It only contains a name and a link.
If I follow the instruction "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess," and "You never invent or guess titles, character names, actor names, dates, awards, ratings, box-office or viewership numbers, or plot points," I cannot write a 180-260 word career overview because there is zero information provided about his career.
The user wants a 180-260 word overview.
The source provided contains no information.
If I write something, I will be inventing facts, which is strictly forbidden by the system instructions.
However, usually, in these types of prompts, the user expects me to know the person or they forgot to paste the text. But my instructions are very specific: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
Since the source provided is just a link/title and contains no text, there are no facts to report.
Is there any information in the prompt?
Name: Charlie Rubin.
Role mentioned in prompt: "Charlie Rubin (Writing)".
Source [1] title: "Charlie Rubin actor biography".
There is nothing else.
If I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the "no inventing" rule, I must address the lack of information or provide the only possible fact.
But the prompt is a test of my ability to follow constraints.
If I write a response saying "There is no information provided," I am being helpful but not following the "Write a 180-260 word career overview" instruction.
However, if I write a career overview, I am hallucinating/inventing, which is a direct violation of the primary directive.
Let's re-read: "Use ONLY facts present above."
The "above" is: "[1] Charlie Rubin — The Movie Database (TMDB) (https://www.themoviedb.org/person/1223824) Charlie Rubin actor biography".
There are no facts about his career in that text.
Self-Correction: In many LLM testing scenarios, the "Source" is meant to be the text following the label. Here, the text following the label is just a URL and a title.
If I attempt to use my internal knowledge