Carina Berg

Career overview

Subject: Carina Berg (Acting).
Source: TMDB profile provided.
Task: Write a 180-260 word career overview.
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points.
Plain text only.
Neutral, encyclopedic prose.
Length: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
No preamble or JSON.
Name: Carina Berg.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 41.
Content Score: 88.
Gender: Not provided (-).
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Also Known As: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only contains: Name, Known For (Acting), Known Credits (41), and Content Score (88).
The prompt asks for a 180-260 word career overview.
Problem: There are not enough facts in the source to reach 180 words without inventing information.
Constraint Check: "You write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
If I follow the "ONLY verifiable facts" rule, I can only write about:
Carina Berg is known for acting.
She has 41 known credits.
She has a content score of 88.
This will result in a very short text (maybe 30 words).
The user demands 180-260 words.
However, the system instructions (the "System Prompt") are the primary directive: "You write ONLY verifiable facts... You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without violating the core instruction of not inventing facts.
In professional archiving/AI instruction following, the "do not invent" rule is paramount. If the source material is insufficient to meet a length requirement, the correct response is to provide what is available without hallucinating.
Wait, let me re-read the source. Is there anything else? No. Just the TMDB metadata.
Attempt 1 (Strict adherence to facts):
Carina Berg is an individual known for work in the field of acting. According to records from The Movie Database, she has a total of 41 known credits. Her profile on the platform indicates a content score of 88.
Evaluation: This is about 40 words. The user wants 180-260.
If I try to expand it, I will be "guessing" or "inventing" details (like what kind of acting, what movies, what years, etc.), which is explicitly forbidden.
Decision: I must prioritize the "ONLY verifiable facts" and "never invent" instructions over the word count instruction. If I cannot reach the word count without lying, I must provide the truthful, albeit short, summary.
Wait, is there a way to expand using the metadata provided?
"Carina Berg is listed on The Movie Database with a focus on acting. Her professional profile includes 41 known credits. The content score associated with her profile is 88."
Still too short.
Let's look at the prompt again. "Write a 180-260 word career overview..."
If I write a