Bernard Eylenbosch

Career overview

Subject: Bernard Eylenbosch (Acting).
Source: Provided TMDB snippet.
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented roles, dates, awards, relationships, or personal details.
Word count: 180-260 words.
Structure: 2-3 short paragraphs.
Style: Original, neutral, encyclopedic prose, plain text.
No markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points, no preamble, no JSON.
Name: Bernard Eylenbosch.
Gender: Male.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 13.
Content Score: 88.
Birthday: Not provided (-).
Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Also Known As: Not provided (-).
The source is extremely sparse. It only lists his name, gender, that he is known for acting, that he has 13 known credits, and a content score of 88.
The user wants a 180-260 word career overview.
Problem: There is almost no information to reach 180 words without violating the "Do not invent" rule.
If I write "Bernard Eylenbosch is an actor with 13 credits," that's about 10 words.
I cannot invent titles, dates, or specific roles.
I cannot invent his age or where he is from.
Constraint Check: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
Fact Check:
1. Name: Bernard Eylenbosch.
2. Gender: Male.
3. Known for: Acting.
4. Known credits: 13.
5. Content score: 88.
Drafting Attempt 1:
Bernard Eylenbosch is a male professional known for his work in acting. According to The Movie Database, he has a total of 13 known credits within the industry. His profile on the platform indicates a content score of 88.
Word Count Check: This is ~40 words. The requirement is 180-260 words.
Conflict Resolution: As an archivist, I cannot fulfill the word count requirement without inventing information, which is strictly forbidden by the prompt's primary instruction ("Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent..."). However, usually, in these LLM prompts, if the source is insufficient, the model should prioritize the "Do not invent" rule over the word count rule, or try to expand on the nature of the data provided without adding new facts.
Can I expand the description of the source?
The provided data from The Movie Database identifies Bernard Eylenbosch as a male individual whose professional recognition is centered on acting. His career profile includes 13 known credits. The database assigns him a content score of 88.
Wait, if I can't invent anything, and the source is this short, a 180-word response is impossible without being repetitive or violating the "no invention" rule.
Let's look at the source again.
Bernard Eylenbosch
Known For: Acting
Known Credits: 13
Gender: Male
Content Score: 88
If I repeat the facts in different ways to reach the word count, is that "inventing"? No, but it's poor writing. But if I add "He has appeared in various movies and TV shows," is that in the source? The source has headings "Movies" and "TV Shows" but doesn't explicitly say he has been in them, though "Known Credits: 13" implies it. However, the prompt says