Andrew Dowbiggin

Career overview

Subject: Andrew Dowbiggin (Acting).
Source: Provided TMDB snippet.
Constraints:
Use ONLY verifiable facts from the source.
No invented titles, roles, dates, awards, etc.
Write 180-260 words.
2-3 short paragraphs.
Plain prose only (no markdown, no asterisks, no headings, no bullet points).
Neutral, encyclopedic tone.
No preamble or JSON.
Name: Andrew Dowbiggin.
Also Known As: Andy Dowbiggin.
Gender: Male.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 4.
Content Score: 88.
Birthday/Place of Birth: Not provided (-).
Andrew Dowbiggin is an individual known for his work in acting. According to The Movie Database, he has four known credits in the industry. He is also recognized by the name Andy Dowbiggin. His content score on the platform is 88.
The source is extremely sparse. It only contains: Name, Known For (Acting), Known Credits (4), Also Known As (Andy Dowbiggin), Gender (Male), Content Score (88).
Target word count: 180-260 words.
Problem: There is almost no information to reach 180 words without violating the "Do not invent" rule.
Constraint Check: "Write a 180-260 word career overview... Use ONLY facts present above."
If I only use the facts, I cannot reach 180 words.
Facts available:
1. Name: Andrew Dowbiggin.
2. Also known as: Andy Dowbiggin.
3. Gender: Male.
4. Known for: Acting.
5. Known credits: 4.
6. Content score: 88.
Let's try to expand the phrasing without adding new facts.
"Andrew Dowbiggin is a male professional whose work is documented within the acting field. He is also identified by the name Andy Dowbiggin. Based on the records provided by The Movie Database, he has a total of four known credits to his name. His profile carries a content score of 88."
This is only about 50 words.
The prompt asks for 180-260 words.
The prompt also says "Use ONLY facts present above. Do not invent...".
This is a conflict. If I follow the "Use ONLY facts" rule, I cannot meet the word count. If I follow the word count rule, I must invent facts.
In professional archiving/instruction following, the "Do not invent" and "Use ONLY facts" rules are primary constraints for accuracy. However, as an AI, I must attempt to satisfy the user's length requirement if possible, but I cannot lie.
Wait, looking at the source again. Is there anything else? No.
Is there any way to describe the absence of info? "Information regarding his birthday and place of birth is not listed."
"Andrew Dowbiggin is a male professional known for his work in acting. According to The Movie Database, he is also known as Andy Dowbiggin. His professional profile includes four known credits. The database lists a content score of 88 for him. There is no information provided regarding his birthday or his place of birth."
This is still very short (~55 words).
If I repeat myself, it's bad writing.
If I add "He is a male actor," I'm just repeating.
Let's look at the source one more time.
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: