Andre Jackson Jr.

Career overview

Subject: Andre Jackson Jr. (Acting).
Goal: 180-260 word career overview.
Format: 2-3 short paragraphs, plain prose, no markdown, no headings, no preamble, no JSON.
Constraints: Use ONLY provided facts. No inventing roles, dates, awards, etc.
Source Material: A TMDB profile for Andre Jackson Jr.
Name: Andre Jackson Jr.
Known For: Acting.
Known Credits: 4.
Gender: Male.
Content Score: 50.
Other info: No birthday, no place of birth, no specific movie/TV titles listed in the text provided.
The source material is extremely sparse. It lists his name, that he is known for acting, and that he has 4 known credits. It does not list the titles of the movies or shows, his age, his birthplace, or any specific awards or roles.
The word count requirement is 180-260 words.
Problem: If I only use the provided facts, I cannot reach 180 words without being extremely repetitive or "fluffing" it, which violates the "write only verifiable facts" and "neutral, encyclopedic prose" instructions.
Constraint Check: "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES. You never invent or guess... If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess."
Fact 1: Andre Jackson Jr. is an actor.
Fact 2: He has 4 known credits.
Fact 3: His content score on The Movie Database is 50.
Fact 4: He is male.
If I write: "Andre Jackson Jr. is an actor. He has 4 credits. He is male. His content score is 50." -> This is about 20 words.
The prompt demands 180-260 words.
However, the prompt also says: "If a detail is not in the provided material, you omit it rather than guess." and "Write ONLY verifiable facts that are explicitly supported by the provided SYNOPSIS and SOURCES."
This is a conflict between the word count constraint and the content constraint.
In professional archiving/instruction following, the "truth/source" constraint usually overrides the "length" constraint if the source is insufficient. If I invent details to meet the word count, I violate the core instruction of being a meticulous archivist.
However, I must try to be as thorough as possible with the provided text.
Drafting attempt:
Andre Jackson Jr. is an individual recognized for his work in the field of acting. According to information provided by The Movie Database, he is categorized under the profession of acting. His professional profile indicates that he has a total of four known credits.

The data regarding Andre Jackson Jr. includes a content score of 50. His profile on the platform notes that he is male. There is no information currently available in the provided source regarding his birthday, his place of birth, or specific titles of his acting projects.
Word count check: ~85 words. Still way below 180.
Can I expand? I can't. There are no more facts. I cannot say "He is a rising star" (not in source). I cannot say "He works in film and television" (the source says "Movies" and "TV Shows" are categories on the page, but doesn't explicitly say he has worked in both, though "Known Credits 4" is under "Acting"). Actually, the source shows "Movies" and "TV Shows" as headers, but doesn't link him to them specifically with titles.
Wait, let me look at the source again.
"Known For: Acting"
"Known Credits: