Thor Gotaas lives without a mobile phone in Norway, a country where 99% of adults use mobile technology. Gotaas, who relies on computers, email, and landlines for communication, describes the physical sensation of using a mobile device as uncomfortable and views the current hardware design as unsuitable for his needs.
The saturation of mobile devices in Norway has reached a point where 99% of the adult population relies on them for daily communication. Amid this near-total adoption, Thor Gotaas remains a distinct outlier, opting out of the mobile ecosystem entirely.
Mobile Saturation and the Norwegian Outlier
Reporting from *Fosna-Folket* highlights the rarity of Gotaas’s position. While the vast majority of the Norwegian population is integrated into mobile networks, Gotaas maintains his connectivity through a different technical stack. He uses computers and email for digital correspondence and continues to utilize a landline for conducting interviews. This approach bypasses the mobile-first paradigm that currently governs social and professional interactions in the region.
Ergonomic Friction in Touch-Centric Design
Gotaas’s rejection of mobile technology is rooted in both physical and cognitive friction. He has identified a disconnect between modern device ergonomics and his personal usability requirements. He noted that the devices are made for women and small children
, suggesting a perceived mismatch in scale and interface design.
The physical interface of modern smartphones—characterized by small touch targets and high-density displays—presents specific challenges. Gotaas reported that there is so little to press on and then there are codes and I get quite ill
. This highlights a recurring issue in human-computer interaction where the miniaturization of inputs and the increasing complexity of security protocols, such as PIN codes, can create significant user distress or physical discomfort.
Alternative Digital Workflows
By maintaining a desktop-centric workflow, Gotaas avoids the specific ergonomic pitfalls of handheld mobile devices. His reliance on computers and email indicates that his exclusion is not a rejection of digital communication itself, but rather a rejection of the specific form factor and interface logic of the smartphone.
The mobile revolution has prioritized portability and constant connectivity, but the experience of Gotaas suggests that for certain users, the trade-offs in ergonomics and cognitive load remain unacceptably high. His reliance on landlines and computers maintains a functional, albeit non-standard, communication method in a society that has largely moved past these legacy systems.